MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084896975 · doi:10.2118/0605-0079-jpt

Sulfide-Stress-Crack Resistance of QT-900 Coiled Tubing

2005· article· en· W2084896975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Bybee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress corrosion crackingBrineCoiled tubingHydrogen sulfideSour gasMetallurgyCorrosionMaterials scienceGeologyEngineeringPetroleum engineeringWaste managementChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 93786, "SSC Resistance of QT-900 Coiled Tubing," by T. McCoy, Halliburton, prepared for the 2005 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 12-13 April. Laboratory sulfide-stress-cracking (SSC) tests were performed on specimens taken from a QT-900 coiled-tubing (CT) test string to define zones of acceptable sour service. SSC tests were performed at room temperature in a brine-fluid environment with H2S partial pressures ranging from 0.145 to 145.0 psi and pH levels from 2.8 to 4.5. The effectiveness of a new inhibitor for crack prevention was tested. SSC testing, which included Natl. Assn. of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Method A tensile, four-point bent-beam (FPBB), and slow-strain-rate (SSR) test specimens, was performed on as-milled as well as fatigue-cycled tubing. Introduction After the failure of two QT-900 strings in high-H2S-content wells in Canada in 2002, it was obvious that a better understanding of the SSC susceptibility of QT-900 CT was needed. Before these failures, use of QT-900 CT in sour wells had been very successful. Canadian operations used QT-900 CT in 112 wells containing 0.03 to 35% H2S without incident before these two failures. Investigation of the QT-900 string failures [1½- and 1¾-in. outside diameter (OD)] showed two common characteristics of the failures besides the exposure to sour fluids: (1) all SSC cracking occurred at OD mechanical damage, and (2) hydrochloric acid was used in both wells. All SSC cracks in both strings occurred at damage located on the seam weld, even though equivalent damage was present at other areas around the tubing. The 1½-in.-OD string failed at areas damaged by semicircular gripper blocks, and the 1¾-in.-OD string failed at areas damaged by V gripper blocks. Besides the presence of high amounts of H2S, both of the common factors (mechanical damage and low pH from the introduction of acid) were important, and the failures might not have occurred if either of these factors had been mitigated. Although other factors such as strength and hardness, ductility, chemistry, and fatigue cycles are important, they are not as fundamentally important as the environment in which the tubing is being operated. If the tubing becomes hydrogenated because of the interaction of H2S on the metal surface, tubing properties will change significantly. The full-length paper concentrates on determining how various sour environments affect the SSC resistance of QT-900 CT. Experimental Domains The testing was performed on undamaged samples with the knowledge that mechanical damage is important and needs to be minimized and monitored by nondestructive inspection techniques. To offset this deficiency, full 30-day SSC tests were run even though workover strings are not exposed to sour fluid for this length of time during operations. Defining domains of sour-service severity is a common approach for operations involving sour-service production using carbon- and low-alloy-steel components. The domain concept, which has been adopted by European Federation of Corrosion (EFC) Publication Number 16 and NACE MR0175/Intl. Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15156, covers room-temperature (i.e., 75°F) conditions. Testing at a temperature of 75°F is more severe for carbon and low-alloy steels than testing at elevated temperatures. CT can become hydrogenated downhole at higher temperatures, leading to failure of the tubing at the top when the string has cooled somewhat and is going over the gooseneck or onto the reel. Therefore, it is logical that these domains can and should be used as a guide in determining suitable environments where CT can be used successfully in sour fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207