MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084939802 · doi:10.1080/02648725.2013.801233

Metabolic status of pluripotent cells and exploitation for growth in stirred suspension bioreactors

2013· review· en· W2084939802 on OpenAlexaff
Brad Day, Derrick E. Rancourt

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellBioreactorRegenerative medicineSuspension cultureCell biologyBiologySuspension (topology)GlycolysisBiotechnologyCell cultureBiochemical engineeringBiochemistryStem cellMetabolismEmbryonic stem cellGeneticsBotanyEngineeringGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pluripotent stem cells are of great interest in the field of regenerative medicine. Recent studies have shown that they maintain a glycolytic metabolic status while pluripotent and wholesale changes to mitochondrial and metabolic profile occur during differentiation. This article reviews the process and how this may be exploited in a stirred suspension bioreactor for rapid growth while maintaining pluripotency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology and Genetic Engineering ReviewsSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207