MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085009726 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4339

Abstract 4339: RGD-conjugated nanoparticles for targeted inhibition of adhesion and migration of integrin αvβ3-overexpressing breast cancer cells.

2013· article· en· W2085009726 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Shan, Ping Cai, Preethy Prasad, Andrew M. Rauth, Xiao Yu Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegrinChemistryAdhesionBiodistributionCancer cellCell adhesionBiophysicsCancer researchReceptorCellIn vitroMolecular biologyCancerBiochemistryMedicineBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Tumor cell adhesion and migration are critical in the establishment of metastasis. This study aims to develop a RGD-conjugated nanoparticle system that is able to target αvβ3 integrin receptor-overexpressing breast tumor cells while evading the liver uptake, thus enhancing treatment of cancer metastasis through inhibition of adhesion and migration of cancer cells. Methods: The nanoparticle formulation was first optimized with a suitable concentration of RGD targeting moiety on the nanoparticle surface to maximize nanoparticle accumulation in tumor and minimize liver uptake. RGD-conjugated solid lipid nanoparticles (RGD-SLNs) were synthesized with a fatty acid lipid core and a poly(ethylene glycol) corona and decorated with varying concentrations of RGD peptides (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 5% and 10% mol/mol ratio). The quantity and kinetics of the nanoparticle binding to αvβ3 integrin receptor and in vitro cellular uptake on αvβ3 positive MDA-MB-231 cells were investigated by fluorescence microscopy and compared with the results with αvβ3 negative MCF-7 cells. The influence of RGD-SLNs on cell adhesion and migration via binding to αvβ3 integrin receptor was examined using standard adhesion and transwell migration assays. Whole animal biodistribution, tumor uptake and intratumoral distribution of quantum dot-loaded nanoparticles were investigated to identify optimized RGD-concentrations. Results: RGD-SLNs showed specific binding for αvβ3 integrin receptors on MDA-MB-231 cells as compared to the negative control (MCF-7 cells). The RGD-SLN formed clusters at the cellular membrane and then entered the cells at a lower pace than SLN. The RGD-SLNs also exhibited higher cellular uptake compared to SLN in MDA-MB-231 cells while there was no detectable difference in uptake in αvβ3 negative MCF-7 cells. RGD concentration of 1% on the SLN surface was found to have most tumor retention and low liver uptake among all formulations. Receptor mediated uptake of RGD-SLNs reduced cell adhesion and migration towards fibronectin gradient, attributable to the occupation of the receptors by the RGD-SLN and slow recycling of the receptors to the cell surface. Conclusions: We have optimized the RGD-SLN formulation to maximize tumor accumulation and minimize liver uptake. The RGD-SLN formulation has the potential to prevent metastasis through interference with cell adhesion and migration. Citation Format: Dan Shan, Ping Cai, Preethy Prasad, Andrew Michael Rauth, Xiao Yu Wu. RGD-conjugated nanoparticles for targeted inhibition of adhesion and migration of integrin αvβ3-overexpressing breast cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4339. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4339

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207