MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085015949 · doi:10.5539/mas.v2n5p99

Study and Design of Impellers for Multiphase Reactors

2008· article· en· W2085015949 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Delan Devakumar, K. G. Saravanan

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpellerTurbinePaddlePower (physics)Materials scienceSlip factorMechanical engineeringViscosityPower consumptionMechanicsProcess engineeringEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of the project is to design impellers of different dimensions in each of the three types, namely paddle, pitched and turbine, to analyze them under various parameters to find out the best impeller of the best dimension for applications. The parameters to be varied and analyzed are impeller diameter, vessel diameter, clearance between impeller and the vessel, viscosity, liquid height and addition of electrolytes like glycerol, dilatants, etc. These impellers are tested and compared to get maximum gas holdup and minimum power consumption; from the comparison it is found that the pitched is the best among the three. Then it is proceeded to test the pitched impellers of various dimensions under the different parameters as mentioned above. For all comparisons and analysis, graphs are plotted between speed and gas holdup, power and gas holdup. From the results, to find the impeller which has maximum gas holdup and minimum power consumption that is suited for particular application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207