The effect of variability in temporal information on the control of a dynamic task
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study is about the effect of temporal uncertainty on the control of a dynamic task. Two types of temporal uncertainty are defined: Data Uncertainty (DU), the variability in temporal information, and Knowledge Uncertainty (KU), the complexity in the temporal structure of a situation. The effect of temporal data uncertainty on the control of a dynamic task with high knowledge temporal uncertainty is tested experimentally. Fifty-seven participants practiced the computerized game ‘Save the Whale’, with three levels of data uncertainty about the moment of occurrence of critical events, DU0, DU1 and DU2. Results show that performance is better in the DU0 than in the other two conditions, which do not differ from each other. The performance improves with practice at the same rate, regardless of the level of uncertainty. It is also shown that the control strategies reported by the participants become more variable with an increase in uncertainty. It is concluded that temporal data uncertainty does not limit temporal pattern learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it