MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085049155 · doi:10.1109/dest.2013.6611333

RESTful dissemination of healthcare data in mobile digital ecosystem

2013· article· en· W2085049155 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rahnuma Kazi, Ralph Deters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisseminationComputer scienceEvent (particle physics)Health careArchitectureSynchronizingDigital ecosystemMobile computingMultimediaWorld Wide WebComputer networkData scienceTelecommunicationsDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile technology is playing a significant role in transforming the healthcare domain and enabling a new era of digital healthcare ecosystem. In healthcare, tablets are replacing the conventional paper-based way of tracking patient's record. These devices are not only used to collect user's inputs as events, they can perform various analytical computations and provide an instant output in order to meet investigator's need. As these tablets are interacting over wireless networks, the communication often suffers intermittent connection loss. This can prevent tablets from successfully propagating event data. In this paper, we propose a novel architecture for disseminating events among mobile participants. Our architecture has two contributions - first, it addresses the challenge of Wi-Fi network while synchronizing data among tablets, and second, it develops a RESTful architecture assuming that only HTTP like protocol is used in event dissemination. Our framework adopts PInGO (Pain Information on the Go) application that has been developed in research collaboration with Bioinformatics Research Lab at University of Saskatchewan for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) patients. Patient's inputs from the application were used in disseminating event data within the proposed framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207