Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of axis alignment errors, planetary rotation, and tidal forces on rotating liquid mirrors are analyzed. These produce a surface distortion that decreases exponentially with distance inward from the rim with a characteristic length l= square root of 3hf/2, where h is the thickness of the fluid and f is the focal length. Even a small tilt of the rotation axis can produce a significant deformation of the optical surface. The maximum surface height error is 3epsilonl, where epsilon is the tilt angle and is typically of the order of 1.5 microm for a 1 arc sec tilt. The main optical effect of the wave is to produce a ring, with angular diameter 6epsilon, offset by half of the diameter in the direction opposite the tilt. This diamond ring aberration can be avoided by accurate alignment of the rotation axis or by masking the outer few centimeters of the mirror. Planetary rotation produces a small deformation of the order of 100 nm for a 10 m telescope at low latitude on Earth. This deformation can be canceled by a small tilt of the rotation axis. Tidal forces produced by the Moon, or by the Earth in the case of a lunar telescope, produce an inconsequential, subnanometer, surface deformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".