MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chronic Hyperpigmented Scaly Plaques—Quiz Case

2012· article· en· W2085085272 on OpenAlex
Leah Mirsky, Kevin Watters, Fatemeh Jafarian

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Dermatology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 47-year-old black woman of Haitian descent presented with a 20-year history of a persistent nonpruritic rash involving her trunk and the proximal aspect of her legs. Prior lesions had also involved her buttocks and breasts. She had tried several courses of topical steroids, with no improvement. Her medical history was remarkable for Crohn disease, which was in remission. There was no family history of similar skin lesions. Physical examination revealed well-demarcated, circular, scaly, hyperpigmented plaques with an atrophic cigarette paper texture on the trunk, thighs, and buttocks (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The findings of laboratory investigations, including a complete blood cell count, liver function tests, thyroid-stimulating hormone, albumin, and a basic metabolic panel, were normal. A chest x-ray film showed no abnormalities. The results of a potassium hydroxide preparation and a fungal culture were negative. A skin biopsy specimen was obtained from a plaque on the trunk (Figure 3). What is your diagnosis?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it