MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085090386 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31817746c8

Treatment of the Chronic Pilonidal Sinus Wound with a Local Perforator-Assisted Transposition Flap

2008· article· en· W2085090386 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rebecca A. Nelson, Donald H. Lalonde

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Plastic SurgeonsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgerySinus (botany)Wound healingTransposition (logic)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir: Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus wounds is associated with a high failure rate. Transposition and perforator-assisted transposition flaps can be useful for closure of chronic pilonidal sinus wounds, providing well-vascularized skin with tension-free margins and a flattening of the buttock cleft. We present two cases of successful closure of chronic pilonidal sinus wounds with a local transposition flap, the first of which was augmented in its vascular supply with two superior gluteal artery perforators. A 40-year-old man was referred for treatment of a pilonidal sinus chronic wound that had developed a biopsy-proven 4 × 4-cm squamous cell carcinoma at the superior margin of the wound. The wound extended from the top of the buttock cleft to 2 cm above the anus. The cancer and the pilonidal sinus wound were excised with clear margins, and the defect was reconstructed with a superiorly based transposition flap (15 cm superior to inferior, and 8 cm at its widest at the superior portion), with two intact perforators from the superior gluteal artery to augment the blood supply to the flap. The very tip of the flap had excellent bleeding. The flap survived entirely and healing was complete primarily (Fig. 1). There have been no complications at 2 years postoperatively.Fig. 1.: Complete survival without complications after reconstruction with two superior gluteal artery perforators assisting a transposition flap (15 × 8 cm) after excision of a 4 × 4-cm squamous cell cancer arising at the superior part of a chronic pilonidal sinus wound extending to 2 cm above the anus.In our second case, a 27-year-old woman was referred after two previous unsuccessful attempts at excision and closure of a pilonidal sinus wound. The wound was excised and closed with a simple transposition flap smaller and similar in construction to the flap in Figure 1, which healed completely. Although we could have included them, no perforators were required in this flap, as it was smaller and quite well vascularized without perforator augmentation. There have been no postoperative complications at 3 years (Fig. 2).Fig. 2.: Complete survival without postoperative complications with a simple transposition flap of a pilonidal sinus wound that had been operated on twice.Successful outcome in chronic pilonidal wound management is difficult because of a number of factors, including high tension and shearing forces with excision and primary closure, high moisture and contamination rates, and difficulty with skin graft take and instability in this region. Gluteal island perforator flaps have been used for successful repair of sacral defects for more than a decade.1–3 The provision of extremely well-vascularized skin with a tension-free closure provides a logical solution to some of the problems of pilonidal disease. In a large wound such as in the first case, the blood supply to such a large flap (8 × 15 cm) would have been less robust if either the base of the flap (venous outflow) or the perforators (arterial inflow and venous outflow) had been severed. Keeping the base of the transposition flap intact not only provided increased venous outflow to the perforator flap but also prevented kinking of the perforators themselves, which can lead to island perforator flap necrosis and failure. The orientation of the transposition flap allows for tension-free closure on either side of the midline and flattening of the buttock cleft; both of these factors decrease the risk of pilonidal sinus wound recurrence. Rebecca Nelson, M.D. Don Lalonde, M.D. Dalhousie University Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada DISCLOSURES This project was not commercially funded and uses no commercial products. There are no commercial or financial affiliations or gains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicAnorectal Disease Treatments and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207