Combined‐element frequency selective surfaces with multiple transmission poles and zeros
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel combined‐element frequency selective surface (FSS) is proposed for multi‐band applications. In this design, complementary square loops and meandering slots are combined to construct the composite FSS. The proposed FSS provides three transmission poles and two transmission zeros, transmitting the desired signals at 8.5, 11 and 16 GHz while reflecting the unnecessary signals at 9.6 and 13.1 GHz. This FSS has the advantages of flexible and simple structure, easy processing and low profile compared with traditional multi‐pole FSSs. The design strategy of the proposed FSS and the associated equivalent circuit model are provided to analyse the frequency characteristics. A prototype is fabricated and measured, showing a superior and stable frequency response in case of oblique incidence for both the transverse‐electric (TE) and transverse‐magnetic (TM) polarisations. Good agreement between the simulated and measured results is observed. Finally, the higher‐order FSS with good frequency selectivity is investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it