MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085187722 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2196450

Development and Analysis of Applicability of a Hybrid Transient Simulation Platform Combining TSA and EMT Elements

2012· article· en· W2085187722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Fault (geology)Electric power systemComputer scienceElectronic engineeringInterface (matter)EngineeringStability (learning theory)Transient analysisPower (physics)Control engineeringElectrical engineeringTransient response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the use of hybrid simulation combining electromagnetic transients (EMT) simulation and transient stability (TSA) simulation to model large networks. By comparing with a full detailed EMT simulation, the paper shows that the hybrid approach gives more accurate results than TSA simulation alone, when power electronic equipment is included in the EMT part of the model. The paper also considers line switching and faults in the TSA part of the model which were ignored in earlier approaches, and shows that the accuracy is a function of the electrical distance of the fault to the interface bus bars. A new method to improve this accuracy with the use of switchable frequency dependent network equivalents (FDNE) is also introduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it