Effect of High‐Dose Vitamin C on Hepatic Cytochrome P450 3A4 Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of high-dose vitamin C on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 activity, and to evaluate possible sex-specific effects on CYP3A4 activity. DESIGN: Single-center longitudinal study. SETTING: Tertiary- and specialty-care teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Fourteen healthy Caucasian adult volunteers (seven men, seven women). INTERVENTION: Subjects self-administered vitamin C 500 mg twice/day for 14 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hepatic CYP3A4 activity was measured by using the erythromycin breath test on days 1 (baseline) and 15. Overall, no significant effect of vitamin C on CYP3A4 activity was observed. Sex and baseline results were significant predictors of changes in CYP3A4 activity. In men, mean activity increased by 21.9% (95% confidence interval -3.88-47.6%). The effect in women was not consistent. CONCLUSION: Sex and baseline CYP3A4 activity appeared to influence the effect of vitamin C on CYP3A4 activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".