In vivo digital imaging of the square-edged barrier effect of a silicone intraocular lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare by high-magnification digital photography the lens epithelial cell (LEC) response and capsule dynamics in vivo after implantation of a square-edged and a round-edged silicone intraocular lens (IOL) in a fellow-eye study. SETTING: Private practice and Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, and Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, Orillia, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: After phacoemulsification, a single surgeon implanted a square-edged silicone IOL (SoFlex SE, Bausch & Lomb) in 25 patients who had previously had a conventional round-edged version of the same IOL (SoFlex Li61U, Bausch & Lomb) implanted in their contralateral eye within a 6-week period. SoFlex SE IOL recipients were selected sequentially from those scheduled for surgery within a 3-day period. The IOLs were sequentially photographed 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery using magnification of at least x64 through a biomicroscope and a high-resolution digital camera with adapter. Images were transferred to a graphics computer and compared over time. RESULTS: At 1 week, both designs had evidence of LEC migration along the posterior capsule, with the highest cell density around the 6 o'clock position. At 1 month, both IOL designs showed 360 degrees of anterior and posterior capsule adhesion to the edge of the optic. At 1 month, however, migrating LECs encountered a "damming" effect at the square posterior edge but not at the round edge. A thin fibrotic ring began to form around the SoFlex SE edge at 2 months and was complete for 360 degrees at 3 months. At 9 months, there was no evidence of LEC migration beyond this ring. With round-edged IOLs, the fibrotic ring never fully formed and LEC migration continued posterior to the optic. There was a tight capsule shrink-wrap effect with the square-edged IOLs with the fibrotic ring, allowing minimal IOL movement between 1 month and 9 months. The round-edged IOLs tended to decenter and rotate. Anterior capsulorhexis contraction was greater at every time point with the round-edged IOLs than with the square-edged IOLs. CONCLUSION: Early contact inhibition of LECs by a square-edged IOL design and its effects were demonstrated in vivo with sequential, high-resolution digital photography and commercially available graphics software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".