MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085263807 · doi:10.1353/esc.0.0159

Then, Now, and Next

2008· article· en· W2085263807 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Heather Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipHistorySociologyMedia studiesLibrary sciencePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Then, Now, and Next Heather Murray (bio) Marjorie Garson’s history of the first twenty-five years of acute ends in 1982 with the conference in Ottawa, with the association about to move on from its home at the University of Toronto and with a cautionary note: “In the present economic situation, when universities are under intense financial pressure, the humanities find themselves in a serious, even dangerous position.” Plus ça change, one might be tempted to murmur. But in the twenty-eight years since Garson’s history concluded, much, indeed, has changed. The acute conference at the University of Ottawa had a fairly restricted program, composed of single-paper sessions for the most part, and no more than three concurrently, with some thirty-eight papers in all. The 2009 accute conference at Carleton evidenced a process of almost exponential growth, with almost seven times as many papers as well as a plethora of social events and meetings. The scholarship in 1982 might be judged traditional by some, although there were the first stirrings of theory: a panel on Theory in the Classroom with Jennifer Levine and Paul Smith and another on Unity of the Text with Patricia Gordon, Tilottama Rajan, and Gordon Teskey. A glance at the run of issues of English Studies in Canada for 1982 shows a similar consolidation of interests, with more [End Page 1] than one-third of the papers on nineteenth-century literature (if you add eighteenth-century to that number, you get 40 percent of the total), only a few articles on contemporary authors, and two on critical topics. On the other hand, the more recent expansion of the accute conference and the diversification of the association’s membership has led to an explosion of perspectives, topics, and cross-disciplinary connections, while boundary pushing is encouraged by the redesigned and re-envisaged esc. There are other changes too: the addition of the second C in the association’s name, the institution of the annual hiring report, the expansion of accute’s professional issues portfolio, and more. Some things have stayed the same, for better or for worse. For better: accute continues in its most important task, that of networking teachers and students of English (however we might define that term) across our many research fields and institutional affiliations. For worse: item 8 on the agm Agenda for 1982—“Report of the Sub-Committee on Professional Concerns (Employment Problems)”—could as well be a discussion topic for next May. The five contributors to this esc Readers’ Forum were asked to take the occasion of the reprinting of Marjorie Garson’s history to reflect on the future of accute and on the idea of “academic association” more generally. While all write from their own academic and personal locations, there are some serendipitous similarities. All describe accute as a co-operative endeavour, a community, or a collectivity. All focus on accute’s political and professional responsibilities and contemplate the past and future, the possibilities and the limitations, of “activist academe” (in Linda Hutcheon’s phrase). For Noreen Golfman (a past-president of accute and the current president of the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences), accute gains some of its strongest political traction through its role in the Federation; the Federation, in turn, has been shaped by key figures from accute. For Matt Kavanagh (chair of his department at Okanagan College in British Columbia and a theorist of literary-psychoanalytic relations), accute has a double function as a national networking organization and as a counterforce to the alienations of academic life. For Linda Hutcheon (a past president of the Modern Language Association), the challenge for accute today lies in developing new and revitalized ways to combat underemployment and overwork in the humanities, problems that require fresh approaches although they are by now decades old. For Smaro Kamboureli (an expert on the changing conditions of academic work under globalization), accute could play a crucial role in explicating the overdeterminants of the current humanities [End Page 2] employment crisis and the changing valuations of intellectual production. For T.L. Cowan (a newly-minted phd and a Killam Postdoctoral Fellow at Calgary) accute’s “social” and “proactive...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207