MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085267292 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2013.5b28

Autism Risk Rises With Prenatal Valproate Exposure

2013· article· en· W2085267292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyAutismMedicinePediatricsPsychiatryPopulationPregnancyAutism spectrum disorderNeuropsychologyCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Clinical and Research NewsFull AccessAutism Risk Rises With Prenatal Valproate ExposureLeslie SinclairLeslie SinclairPublished Online:17 May 2013https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2013.5b28AbstractValproate is an effective treatment for seizure, pain, bipolar disorder, and other conditions, but the potential for damage with fetal exposure limits its use. For women of childbearing potential who must use valproate as a treatment for epilepsy or neuropsychological disorders, the April 24 JAMA brought more bad news about a drug already associated with risks for congenital malformations and delayed cognitive development resulting from in-utero exposure. It's also associated with significant risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and childhood autism, even after adjusting for the effects of maternal epilepsy. Women of childbearing potential who have epilepsy may choose to use valproate to control seizures, but should be advised of the serious risks should they become pregnant. newphotoservice/Shutterstock Jakob Christensen, Ph.D., of Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark and colleagues performed a population-based study of all children born alive in Denmark from 1996 to 2006, using national registers to identify children exposed to valproate during pregnancy and diagnosed with ASD, including Asperger syndrome, atypical autism, and other or unspecified pervasive developmental disorders.The children were followed up from birth until the day of diagnosis, death, emigration, or December 31, 2010, whichever came first. Out of the 655,615 children included in the study, the researchers identified 2,644 who were exposed to antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy, including 508 exposed to valproate. They found that use of valproate during pregnancy was associated with an absolute risk of 4.42 percent for ASD and an absolute risk of 2.50 percent for childhood autism."In this population-based cohort study, children of women who used valproate during pregnancy had a higher risk of ASD and childhood autism compared with children of women who did not use valproate. Their risks were also higher than those for children of women who were previous users of valproate but who stopped before their pregnancy," Christensen and colleagues said. They also acknowledged that—as serious as even a moderate increase in risk of these disorders can be—their findings must be balanced against the treatment benefits for women who require valproate for epilepsy control. Kimford Meador, M.D., and David Loring, Ph.D., both professors of neurology and pediatrics at Emory University in Atlanta, expressed concern in an accompanying editorial that women of childbearing potential are not being adequately advised of the risks of valproate before it is prescribed."Despite the established risks of fetal valproate exposure, valproate continues to be a common treatment in women of childbearing age," they noted. "Valproate is an effective drug, but it appears that it is being prescribed for women of child-bearing potential at a rate that does not fully consider the ratio of benefits to risks. This raises concern as to whether these women are receiving adequate information for informed consent based on a full understanding of the treatment risks and alternative therapies."They recommended use of alternative medications. "If no alternative effective medications can be found, the lowest effective dose of valproate should be used. Because approximately half of the pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, delaying discussions of treatment risks until a pregnancy is considered will leave a substantial number of children at unnecessary risk," they stated.That's sound advice when the drug is being prescribed for neuropsychological disorders as well. "Valproate is generally regarded as a bad drug to take while pregnant," said Gail Robinson, M.D., director of the Women's Mental Health Program of the University Health Network of Toronto and a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, who commented on the study for Psychiatric News.Robinson noted that valproate is also associated with increased risk for atrial septal defect, hypospadias, cleft palate, craniosynostosis, and spina bifida at rates that far outweigh the risks for ASD. "For all of these reasons, psychiatrists who specialize in peripartum mental health disorders try to avoid its use during pregnancy….Whether or not it increases the risk of autism, where possible it should be eliminated during pregnancy and a safer drug substituted."The study was supported by grants from the European Research Council. Christensen receives research support from the Danish Epilepsy Association. ■"Prenatal Valproate Exposure and Risk of Autism Spectrums Disorders and Childhood Autism" is posted at http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1681408. ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it