MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2085267292 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2013.5b28

Autism Risk Rises With Prenatal Valproate Exposure

2013· article· en· W2085267292 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leslie Sinclair

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEpilepsyAutismMedicinePediatricsPsychiatryPopulationPregnancyAutism spectrum disorderNeuropsychologyCognition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Clinical and Research NewsFull AccessAutism Risk Rises With Prenatal Valproate ExposureLeslie SinclairLeslie SinclairPublished Online:17 May 2013https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2013.5b28AbstractValproate is an effective treatment for seizure, pain, bipolar disorder, and other conditions, but the potential for damage with fetal exposure limits its use. For women of childbearing potential who must use valproate as a treatment for epilepsy or neuropsychological disorders, the April 24 JAMA brought more bad news about a drug already associated with risks for congenital malformations and delayed cognitive development resulting from in-utero exposure. It's also associated with significant risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and childhood autism, even after adjusting for the effects of maternal epilepsy. Women of childbearing potential who have epilepsy may choose to use valproate to control seizures, but should be advised of the serious risks should they become pregnant. newphotoservice/Shutterstock Jakob Christensen, Ph.D., of Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark and colleagues performed a population-based study of all children born alive in Denmark from 1996 to 2006, using national registers to identify children exposed to valproate during pregnancy and diagnosed with ASD, including Asperger syndrome, atypical autism, and other or unspecified pervasive developmental disorders.The children were followed up from birth until the day of diagnosis, death, emigration, or December 31, 2010, whichever came first. Out of the 655,615 children included in the study, the researchers identified 2,644 who were exposed to antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy, including 508 exposed to valproate. They found that use of valproate during pregnancy was associated with an absolute risk of 4.42 percent for ASD and an absolute risk of 2.50 percent for childhood autism."In this population-based cohort study, children of women who used valproate during pregnancy had a higher risk of ASD and childhood autism compared with children of women who did not use valproate. Their risks were also higher than those for children of women who were previous users of valproate but who stopped before their pregnancy," Christensen and colleagues said. They also acknowledged that—as serious as even a moderate increase in risk of these disorders can be—their findings must be balanced against the treatment benefits for women who require valproate for epilepsy control. Kimford Meador, M.D., and David Loring, Ph.D., both professors of neurology and pediatrics at Emory University in Atlanta, expressed concern in an accompanying editorial that women of childbearing potential are not being adequately advised of the risks of valproate before it is prescribed."Despite the established risks of fetal valproate exposure, valproate continues to be a common treatment in women of childbearing age," they noted. "Valproate is an effective drug, but it appears that it is being prescribed for women of child-bearing potential at a rate that does not fully consider the ratio of benefits to risks. This raises concern as to whether these women are receiving adequate information for informed consent based on a full understanding of the treatment risks and alternative therapies."They recommended use of alternative medications. "If no alternative effective medications can be found, the lowest effective dose of valproate should be used. Because approximately half of the pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, delaying discussions of treatment risks until a pregnancy is considered will leave a substantial number of children at unnecessary risk," they stated.That's sound advice when the drug is being prescribed for neuropsychological disorders as well. "Valproate is generally regarded as a bad drug to take while pregnant," said Gail Robinson, M.D., director of the Women's Mental Health Program of the University Health Network of Toronto and a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, who commented on the study for Psychiatric News.Robinson noted that valproate is also associated with increased risk for atrial septal defect, hypospadias, cleft palate, craniosynostosis, and spina bifida at rates that far outweigh the risks for ASD. "For all of these reasons, psychiatrists who specialize in peripartum mental health disorders try to avoid its use during pregnancy….Whether or not it increases the risk of autism, where possible it should be eliminated during pregnancy and a safer drug substituted."The study was supported by grants from the European Research Council. Christensen receives research support from the Danish Epilepsy Association. ■"Prenatal Valproate Exposure and Risk of Autism Spectrums Disorders and Childhood Autism" is posted at http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1681408. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,082

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0250,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesTravaux en français237 207