Spatial Distribution and Temporal Variation of Solar UV Radiation over the Tibetan Plateau
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Tibetan Plateau has very high levels of ultraviolet radiation. To study the UV radiation across the Tibetan Plateau, data from the TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer) satellite for the periods 1979 -1992 and 1997–¬ 2003 are used. The analysis shows a 21-year average of the spatial distribution of daily summer erythemal UV doses across the Tibetan Plateau and its vicinity with a spatial resolution of 1° Lat. - 1.25° Long., also obtains temporal variations during the period 1979 ¬- 2003 of UV radiation for the region by selecting seven locations across the Tibetan Plateau and its neighboring areas. The results show that during the summer months from May to August the average daily erythemal UV doses at the selected seven sites across the Tibetan Plateau range from 7.5 to 9.0 kJ/m2. These daily erythemal UV doses are considerably higher than those observed at geographically close, lower-altitude locations such as Chengdu in China and New Delhi in India, which had corresponding values of 4.1 kJ/m2 and 5.8 kJ/m2, respectively. During the period from 1979 to 1992 observe a clear trend of increasing erythemal UV doses over the Tibetan Plateau. Comparisons between satellite derived UV radiation and ground-based measurements of UV radiation for Lhasa are made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it