MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085318923 · doi:10.1117/1.jei.21.1.013016

Non-local pairwise energy-based model for the high-dynamic-range image compression problem

2012· article· en· W2085318923 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronic Imaging · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTone mappingComputer sciencePairwise comparisonRange (aeronautics)Gradient descentPixelHigh dynamic rangeRepresentation (politics)Image compressionImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmEnergy (signal processing)Computer visionDynamic rangeMathematicsImage processingArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new energy-based compression model for the display of high dynamic range images. The proposed tone mapping method tends to exploit the biologically inspired dynamic retina concept, which is herein mathematically expressed via an image representation based on the specification of the statistical distributions of the nonlocal gradient magnitude. In this framework, which also operates the notion of nonlocal gradient recently put forward by Gilboa and Osher, the detail-preserving contrast reduction problem is therefore expressed by a energy-based model with nonlocal pairwise pixel interactions defined on a complete graph whose cost function is locally minimized by a conjugate gradient descent procedure. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed compression method is efficient and provides pleasing results on various images with different scene contents and performs competitively compared to the best existing state-of-the-art tone mapping methods recently proposed in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it