Formulation of Film Theory Equations for Modeling of Condensation of Steam-Air Mixtures in a Shell and Tube Condenser
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through development of the fundamental equations of Film Theory, condensation of steam in the presence of air in a horizontal counter-current shell and one-path tube condenser is modeled. The interaction between heat and mass transfer and hydrodynamics in the shell-side is taken into consideration. A comparison between the predictions of the model and a set of experimental data available in the archival literature indicates excellent accuracy of the new formulation. The accuracy of the method is further validated by generating profiles of the temperature and pressure drops of the gas flow through the baffles, at various air leakages. Additionally, the effects of air leakage and upstream cooling water temperature are investigated to determine how they influence the total condensation rate, shell-side gas temperature and pressure drops. The results show that the total condensation rate decreases 5% and 20.5% for an air leakage of 1% and 5%, respectively, compared to the situation of pure vapor. Also, increasing the inlet cooling water temperature from 46.5°C to 48.5°C leads to 16.2% reduction in the total condensation rate, i.e., 8.1% per °C. However, this ratio is higher at high temperatures. For example, as the cooling water temperature rises from 50°C to 51°C under identical process conditions, the total condensation rate decreases 11.7% (per °C).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".