MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085341700 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.26

Fuzzy Algorithms for Maximum Lifetime Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks

2008· article· en· W2085341700 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)HeuristicsEnergy consumptionWireless sensor networkMultipath routingEnergy (signal processing)AlgorithmRange (aeronautics)Mathematical optimizationStatic routingRouting protocolComputer networkArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We address the maximum lifetime routing problem in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and propose two online routing algorithms based on fuzzy logic, namely fuzzy maximum lifetime algorithm and fuzzy multiobjective algorithm. The former attempts to maximize the WSN lifetime objective, whereas the latter strives to simultaneously optimize the lifetime as well as the energy consumption objectives. The distinguishing aspect of this work is the novel use of fuzzy membership functions and rules in the design of cost functions for the routing objectives considered in this work. A range of simulation results obtained under various network scenarios show that the proposed approach is superior to a number of other well-known online routing heuristics, both in terms of the obtained network lifetime as well as the average energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207