MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085353479 · doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6364632

Algorithms for pattern selection MIMO systems over spatially correlated channels

2012· article· en· W2085353479 on OpenAlexaff
Xingliang Li, Jean‐François Frigon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOMaximizationSelection (genetic algorithm)Computer scienceRadiation patternChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmSpatial correlationSelection algorithmAntenna (radio)Channel capacityMathematical optimizationMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses radiation pattern selection in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wireless systems. Each receive antenna can be reconfigured to P distinct radiation patterns. We select radiation patterns in order to maximize instantaneous channel capacity. And we prove that for arbitrary correlation the maximum achievable diversity order of the pattern selection MIMO (PS-MIMO) system equals to the rank of the total correlation matrix of its full system so that the link reliability can be significantly improved. We propose a fast selection algorithm as the suboptimal solution for channel capacity maximization. For PS-MIMO systems over spatially correlated channels, we propose to use only a part of available radiation patterns based on the estimation of the correlation before performing the pattern search. Simulations are used to validate the theoretical results and illustrate the performances of proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207