MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085390258 · doi:10.1021/jo047987y

A Theoretical Investigation of α-Carbon Kinetic Isotope Effects and Their Relationship to the Transition-State Structure of S<sub>N</sub>2 Reactions

2005· article· en· W2085390258 on OpenAlexaff
Olle Matsson, Michał Rostkowski, Piotr Paneth, Kenneth Charles Westaway

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinetic isotope effectKinetic energyCarbon fibersTransition (genetics)Isotopes of carbonIsotopeChemistryPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsMaterials sciencePhysicsAtomic physicsNuclear physicsDeuteriumQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[reaction: see text] The transition structures and alpha-carbon 12C/13C kinetic isotope effects for 22 S(N)2 reactions between methyl chloride and a wide variety of nucleophiles have been calculated using the B1LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory. Anionic, neutral, and radical anion nucleophiles were used to give a wide range of S(N)2 transition states so the relationship between the magnitude of the alpha-carbon kinetic isotope effect and transition-state structure could be determined. The results suggest that the alpha-carbon 12C/13C kinetic isotope effects for S(N)2 reactions will be large (near the experimental maximum) and that the curve relating the magnitude of the KIE to the percent transfer of the alpha-carbon from the nucleophile to the leaving group in the transition state has a broad maximum. This means very similar KIEs will be found for early, symmetric, and late transition states and that one cannot use the magnitude of these KIEs to estimate transition-state structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207