MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085395865 · doi:10.5589/m03-043

Radar imagery and saturated areas: decreasing model equifinality

2003· article· en· W2085395865 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christian Puech, P. Gineste

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquifinalityGround truthRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceRadarGround-penetrating radarVegetation (pathology)Scale (ratio)Hydrology (agriculture)GeographyComputer scienceGeologyCartographyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remote sensing data not only permit the local measurement of a phenomenon within a catchment, but also permit the examination of internal fine features and heterogeneity to obtain better knowledge of elementary hydrological processes and compare observed and predicted elementary hydrological processes. The images also enable running the models more effectively when ground truth given by the images fits with the model results. An application is shown for a small catchment in French Brittany (Coët-Dan) through several series of radar images from European Remote Sensing Satellite 1 (ERS-1) and ground observations of saturated areas. ERS radar signals are related not only to soil moisture but also to vegetation and roughness, so these images seem incapable of providing reliable soil moisture mapping directly. Nevertheless, a time series over a short period may yield useful information on soil moisture variations and saturation within a catchment, allowing a comparison of the saturated ground areas with model predictions at the catchment scale. We used Topmodel modelling, which computes the saturated areas at each time step during a rain event. In fact, one ERS-1 image does not permit the detection of the saturated areas, but a time series reveals the wettest areas, which appear to provide valuable assistance for better modelling. Using the global likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology opens an interesting research domain: indeed, models often accept numerous sets of parameters that give quite acceptable flow-rate simulations (equifinality), and the radar observations may help to choose within all the different parameter sets those with internal behaviour close to that of the physical modelling assumptions. Radar data thus help to retain only numerical solutions that are physically consistent and consequently to reduce predictive uncertainty caused by equifinality. This considerably improves our knowledge of elementary hydrological processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207