GENESIS OF CORDIERITE - GEDRITE GNEISSES, CENTRAL METASEDIMENTARY BELT BOUNDARY THRUST ZONE, GRENVILLE PROVINCE, ONTARIO, CANADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cordierite- and gedrite-bearing lithologies crop out along the base of the Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone (CMBbtz) in Ontario, the boundary between the Central Metasedimentary Belt and the Central Gneiss Belt. It has been proposed that these rocks represent metamorphosed and partially melted Al- and Mg-rich sedimentary rocks. Whole-rock oxygen isotope values (δ18O in the range 6–8‰) from these rocks are not consistent with closed-system metamorphism of either soils or pelitic sediments, and cannot be explained solely by extraction of partial melt from pelitic rocks. The whole-rock δ18O and chemical composition of cordierite–gedrite rocks in the CMBbtz indicate that these rocks represent volcanic rocks hydrothermally altered by seawater. After hydrothermal alteration, these rocks were metamorphosed to the upper amphibolite facies, stabilizing the cordierite + gedrite assemblages. Diffusion modeling of quartz–garnet fractionations suggests intermineral exchange of oxygen in a closed system at moderate fugacity of H2O during slow cooling after regional metamorphism. We believe that cordierite–gedrite lithologies in the CMBbtz mark the site of Mid-Proterozoic rifting at the margin of Laurentia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".