MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085425340

Adrenal Injuries and Incidentalomas in Trauma Patients at an Urban Trauma Centre

2012· article· en· W2085425340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Current Surgery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbdominal traumaSurgeryBluntAdrenal adenomaPopulationIncidence (geometry)Blunt traumaRetrospective cohort studyAdenomaRadiologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Trauma patients are frequently evaluated by abdominal computed tomography. The prevalence of adrenal incidentalomas is 4% of the general population, increasing with age. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and follow-up of adrenal lesions in an adult trauma centre. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all trauma admissions to an urban trauma centre in Melbourne, Australia between August 2000 and October 2009 with a discharge diagnosis including adrenal injury, mass, or adenoma. Results: From August 2000 through October 2009, there were 45,576 patients admitted to the Alfred Hospital Trauma Unit, 142 (0.31%) patients had adrenal injuries and 26 (0.06%) patients had adrenal incidentalomas. Of the patients with adrenal injuries, the male-to-female ratio was 3:1. Blunt trauma was responsible in 99% of patients. Right-sided injuries were commoner (73%). Left-sided lesions were present in 19%, and bilateral injuries in 5% (P < 0.0001). Adrenal injury was identified as haemorrhage or haematoma in 95%. In the adrenal injury group, there was the 13% mortality. Follow-up imaging was not performed in 50% of patients; while another 30% only had imaging within 2 weeks, while still hospitalised. Of the 26 patients with incidentalomas, the male-to-female ratio was 1.6:1. All were blunt trauma patients, 69% of identified masses were left-sided lesions, 23% right-sided, and 7.7% were bilateral. Repeat imaging was obtained in 58% of patients, while the remainder was lost to follow-up. Biochemical investigations were performed in 54%. One patient had phaeochromocytoma, and 13 patients had benign incidentalomas. Three patients underwent adrenalectomy: one at the time of trauma laparotomy (benign cortical adenoma); one 5 months post-trauma (phaeochromocytoma); and the final patient 3 months post-trauma (benign vascular epithelial cyst). Conclusions: With increased use of abdominal CT in the evaluation of trauma patients, adrenal lesions are increasingly likely to be found. Follow-up of these lesions in this series has been variable. The development of a protocol for adrenal lesions in trauma patients may improve follow-up care. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/ jcs108w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it