Intramolecular hydrogen atom migration along the backbone of cationic and neutral radical tripeptides and subsequent radical-induced dissociations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dissociation of peptide radical ions involves competition between charge-induced and radical-induced reactions that can be preceded by isomerization. The isomeric radical cations of the peptide methyl ester [G˙GR-OMe](+) and [GG˙R-OMe](+) provide very similar collision-induced dissociation (CID) spectra, suggesting that isomerization occurs prior to fragmentation. They undergo characteristic radical-induced bond cleavage of the peptide N-terminal amide bond resulting in the y2(+) ion, and of the arginine side-chain's Cα-Cβ bond giving protonated allylguanidine {[CH2[double bond, length as m-dash]CHCH2NHC(NH2)2](+), m/z 100}. The absence of a y2(+) fragment ion in the CID of the radical cationic tripeptide [ACH3G˙R](+) and of an m/z 100 ion in the spectrum of [G˙ACH3R](+) (where ACH3 is an α-aminoisobutyric acid residue, which cannot form an α-carbon-centered radical through hydrogen atom transfer) establishes the importance of hydrogen atom migration along the peptide backbone prior to specific radical-induced fragmentations. Herein we use density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) level to evaluate the barriers for interconversion between the α-carbon-centered radicals and for dissociation. The radical cations [G˙GR](+) and [GG˙R](+) have their radicals located on the α-carbon atoms of the peptide backbone and their charge densities largely sequestered on the guanidine groups of the side-chain of arginine residues. This is in contrast to the isomeric radical cations of [GGG]˙(+), in which the charge resides necessarily on the peptide backbone. The lower charge densities on the backbones of [G˙GR](+) and [GG˙R](+) result in greater structural flexibility, decreasing the barrier for interconversion between these α-carbon-centered radicals to 36.2 kcal mol(-1) (cf. 44.7 kcal mol(-1) for [GGG]˙(+)). The total absence of charge, assessed by examining intramolecular hydrogen atom transfers among the three α-carbon centers of the isomeric neutral α-carbon-centered triglycine radicals [GGG-H]˙, leads to an additional but slight reduction in enthalpy, to approximately 34 kcal mol(-1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".