MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085530069 · doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:20030197

Accelerated trip scheme for second-zone distance protection

2003· article· en· W2085530069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Generation Transmission and Distribution · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanSNC-Lavalin (Canada)Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheme (mathematics)Electric power transmissionChannel (broadcasting)Line (geometry)Transmission (telecommunications)Transmission lineComputer sciencePower (physics)Simple (philosophy)Electronic engineeringSimulationElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theoretical aspects, design and testing of a new accelerated trip scheme for second-zone distance protection of HV/EHV transmission lines is described. The scheme is simple and provides relatively high-speed (60–70 ms) operation of the second-zone distance protection without requiring a communication channel. The scheme has been extensively tested using EMTDC simulations under various power system operating conditions. Simulation results show that the selectivity and speed of the proposed scheme are satisfactory for practical use in HV/EHV transmission line distance relays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it