Isotype determination of circulating autoantibodies in canine autoimmune subepidermal blistering dermatoses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The three most common canine autoimmune blistering skin diseases (AISBD), bullous pemphigoid (BP), mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) have recently been separated based on clinical, histological and immunological grounds. The objectives of this study were to determine the isotype profiles of circulating autoantibodies in these dermatoses. Serum was collected from 5 dogs with BP, 15 with MMP and 11 with EBA. All sera were tested using an indirect immunofluorescence method using salt-split canine gingiva as substrate. Anti-basement membrane IgG autoantibodies were detected in all patients. Among the IgG autoantibodies, IgG1 and IgG4 were encountered most frequently, while IgG2 and IgG3 were uncovered in some dogs. IgE autoantibodies were detected more often than IgA or IgM autoantibodies in any of the three entities. The predominance of IgG1, IgG4 and IgE autoantibody isotypes in dogs with AISBD is very similar to the situation found in humans with the homologous diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".