Hybrid multi-Bernoulli CPHD filter for superpositional sensors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose, for the super-positional sensor scenario, a hybrid between the multi-Bernoulli filter and the cardinalized probability hypothesis density (CPHD) filter. We use a multi-Bernoulli random finite set (RFS) to model existing targets and we use an independent and identically distributed cluster (IIDC) RFS to model newborn targets and targets with low probability of existence. Our main contributions are providing the update equations of the hybrid filter and identifying computationally tractable approximations. We achieve this by defining conditional probability hypothesis densities (PHDs), where the conditioning is on one of the targets having a specified state. The filter performs an approximate Bayes update of the conditional PHDs. In parallel, we perform a cardinality update of the IIDC RFS component in order to estimate the number of newborn targets. We provide an auxiliary particle filter based implementation of the proposed filter and compare it with CPHD and multi-Bernoulli filters in a simulated multitarget tracking application
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it