MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Teachers' Work Intensification and Educational Contradictions in Aboriginal Communities

2008· article· fr· W2085578403 on OpenAlexaffabout
Terry Wotherspoon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical scienceEthnologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'auteur se penche sur l'évolution de la nature professionnelle de l'enseignement en relation avec les initiatives pour améliorer l'éducation chez les autochtones. Il examine les répercussions de plusieurs courants potentiellement contradictoires de réforme éducationnelle. Ceux‐ci contiennent en particulier des préoccupations concernant l'augmentation de la tâche des enseignants, la restauration professionnelle de l'enseignement, afin de satisfaire les besoins des sociétés fondées sur le savoir, et leurs conséquences pour les apprenants autochtones et leurs collectivités. Des résultats de sondages sur des enseignants travaillant dans des collectivités autochtones en Saskatchewan et au Manitoba soulignent l'émergence d'un professionnalisme fragmenté dans l'enseignement. Malgré que les enseignants aient exprimé leur engagement envers la réforme, des changements substantiels sont nécessaires pour que les intérêts professionnels des enseignants et les pratiques du système scolaire s'accordent entièrement pour assurer le genre de succès en éducation désiré par les collectivités autochtones. L'absence de mécanismes d'intégration forts pour lier les besoins professionnels des enseignants aux intérêts des autochtones et le manque d'engagement clair de la part du système envers l'équité en éducation pour les autochtones contribuent à créer des inégalités et des problèmes éducationnels potentiellement dommageables chez les élèves qui ont le plus besoin de soutien. This paper explores the changing occupational nature of teaching in relation to initiatives to improve education for Aboriginal people. It examines the impact of multiple, potentially contradictory streams of educational reform. These include, in particular, concerns about the intensification of teachers' work, the professional reconstitution of teaching to meet the needs of knowledge‐based societies, and consequences for Aboriginal learners and communities. Results from surveys of teachers working in Aboriginal communities in Saskatchewan and Manitoba highlight the emergence of a fragmented professionalism within teaching. Despite teachers' expressed commitment to reform, substantial changes are required if teachers' professional interests and school system practice are to become fully aligned to produce the kinds of educational success desired by Aboriginal communities. The absence of strong integrative mechanisms to link teachers' professional needs, Aboriginal community interests, and clear system commitments to education equity for Aboriginal people contributes to uneven and potentially harmful educational consequences for students who are most in need of support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologieSame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207