MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085597054 · doi:10.1139/f02-156

Changes in Pacific hake (<i>Merluccius productus</i>) migration patterns and juvenile growth related to the 1989 regime shift

2002· article· en· W2085597054 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ashleen J. Benson, Gordon A. McFarlane, Susan E. Allen, John F. Dower

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMerlucciusHakeUpwellingJuvenileFisheryOceanographyStock (firearms)Merluccius merlucciusBiologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyEcologyGeologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The response of Pacific hake (Merluccius productus) to recent changes in ocean conditions has been dramatic, with a larger proportion of the stock moving into Canadian waters in the 1990s. Additionally, after 1994, hake spawned in Canadian waters and a portion of the stock remained year round. The change in distribution corresponded with a change in growth of juvenile hake. These changes were examined in relation to upwelling and temperature. We also examined these changes in relation to changes in the abundance of euphausiids, which are the primary food supply. We propose that the 1989 regime shift differentially affected the availability of euphausiids in the northern and southern Coastal Upwelling Domain, with feeding conditions in the north improved relative to those in the south. This promoted faster growth of juveniles in the northern regions during the 1990s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207