MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085613966 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200777302

Structural and magnetic properties of ion‐beam bombarded Co/Pt multilayers

2007· article· en· W2085613966 on OpenAlexaff
K.‐W. Lin, J.‐Y. Guo, Shiquan Lin, Hao Ouyang, C.‐J. Tsai, J. van Lierop, Nguyen N. Phuoc, T. Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsTransmission electron microscopyMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)Ion beamIonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyChemistryNanotechnologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A series of [Pt(2 nm)/Co(2 nm)] 10 /Pt(30 nm) multilayers were deposited by using an ion‐beam technique. X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy results have shown that as‐deposited samples consist of h.c.p. Co and f.c.c. Pt phases. Disordered CoPt 3 phases were developed with increasing End‐Hall voltage (V EH ) that induces greater ion‐beam bombardment energy during deposition. This indicates that intermixing of Co and Pt increases with ion‐beam bombardment. The coercivities (ranging from 100 Oe to 300 Oe) of Co/Pt multilayers decreased with increasing V EH . After annealing, the formation of CoPt 3 was observed in these ion‐beam bombarded samples, resulting in lower coercivities (H c ∼ 50 Oe). The depressed transition temperature of CoPt 3 for films deposited with the largest V EH was attributed to distorted CoPt 3 structures that appeared with annealing. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207