MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2085636267 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/111

THE THERMAL STRUCTURE OF GRAVITATIONALLY DARKENED CLASSICAL Be STAR DISKS

2011· article· en· W2085636267 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. McGill, T. A. A. Sigut, C. E. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsRotation (mathematics)Stellar rotationGravitational energyThin diskGravitationRotation periodStarsGravitational fieldAstronomyGravitational waveGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of gravitational darkening on models of the thermal structure of Be star disks is systematically studied for a wide range of Be star spectral types and rotation rates. Gravitational darkening causes a reduction of the stellar effective temperature toward the equator and a redirection of energy toward the poles. It is an important physical effect in these star–disk systems because the photoionizing radiation from the central B star is the main energy source for the disk. We have added gravitational darkening to the bedisk code to produce circumstellar disk models that include both the variation in the effective temperature with latitude and the non-spherical shape of the star in the calculation of the stellar photoionizing radiation field. The effect of gravitational darkening on global measures of disk temperature is generally significant for rotation rates above 80% of critical rotation. For example, a B0V model rotating at 95% of critical has a density-averaged disk temperature ≈2500 K cooler than its non-rotating counterpart. However, detailed differences in the temperature structure of disks surrounding rotating and non-rotating stars reveal a complex pattern of heating and cooling. Spherical gravitational darkening, an approximation that ignores the changing shape of the star, gives good results for disk temperatures for rotation rates less than ≈80% of critical. However for the highest rotation rates, the distortion of the stellar surface caused by rotation becomes important.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→