A Novel Duplication Confirms the Involvement of 5q23.2 in Autosomal Dominant Leukodystrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the underlying locus and disease-causing mutation for adult-onset autosomal dominant leukodystrophy (ADLD). DESIGN: Previously, an adult-onset ADLD locus on chromosome 5q23 was mapped between markers D5S1495 and CTT/CCT15. This region contains 13 known and putative candidate genes. A 2-point linkage analysis confirmed linkage of a large multigenerational French Canadian family to chromosome 5q23. In addition, screening of the 13 genes within the candidate interval as well as 5 neighboring genes was completed, followed by comparative genomic hybridization. SUBJECTS: A multigenerational French Canadian family with ADLD mimicking progressive multiple sclerosis was identified and studied. Eight affected family members were available for the study and presented with autonomic dysfunction as well as upper motorneuron signs affecting gait. RESULTS: The thorough candidate gene approach did not identify any mutation. Consequently, a whole-chromosome comparative genomic hybridization for chromosome 5 identified a 280-kilobase duplication within the chromosomal band 5q23.2 in 2 affected individuals. This duplication contains 3 genes: LMNB1, FLJ36242, and MARCH3. CONCLUSION: We have identified a novel duplication on chromosomal band 5q23.2 in a French Canadian family with ADLD that supports the implication of duplicated LMNB1 as the disease-causing mutation. However, additional functional studies of lamin B1 overexpression are necessary to elucidate the involvement of lamin B1 in myelination and in degenerative disorders such as ADLD and multiple sclerosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".