MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085646972 · doi:10.1109/pesmg.2013.6672408

Deployment of real-time state estimator and load flow in BC Hydro DMS - challenges and opportunities

2013· article· en· W2085646972 on OpenAlexafffund
Djordje Atanackovic, Valentina Dabic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
FundersBC Hydro
KeywordsSoftware deploymentComputer scienceEstimatorState (computer science)SoftwareProcess (computing)Key (lock)Real-time computingReliability (semiconductor)Distribution management systemReliability engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The object of this paper is to share experiences on deployment and tuning of real-time advanced applications for distribution and distribution state estimator at BC Hydro control center. During past 4 years, BC Hydro has been engaged in the project to procure Distribution Management System (DMS) with objective to enable real-time power system monitoring and control of distribution network in an optimal manner. The emphasis was placed on advanced network applications such as Volt-Var Optimization that are expected to improve the performance and reliability of distribution network. However, a key application that provides basic inputs to advanced applications is distribution state estimator that calculates power system state of distribution network in the real-time. Deployment of state estimator is a difficult process that relies on a number of prerequisites that include, establishing of distribution network model, calibrating and mapping real-time telemetry, extensive software testing and application tuning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207