MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085656345 · doi:10.1017/s144678870003620x

Extremal characterizations of reflexive spaces

2007· article· en· W2085656345 on OpenAlexafffund
Xianfu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Australian Mathematical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University College
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsBanach spaceUniformly convex spaceReflexive spacePure mathematicsReflexivityNorm (philosophy)Differentiable functionRegular polygonLocally convex topological vector spaceProperty (philosophy)Space (punctuation)Banach manifoldLp spaceInterpolation spaceFunctional analysisTopological spaceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Assume that a Banach space has a Fréchet differentiable and locally uniformly convex norm. We show that the reflexive property of the Banach space is not only sufficient, but also a necessary condition for the fulfillment of the proximal extremal principle in nonsmooth analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Australian Mathematical SocietySame topicOptimization and Variational AnalysisFrench-language works237,207