Política cursi y modernidad: los despachos de Ramón Gómez de la Serna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensayo aborda el estudio de los despachos, en plural, que tuvo Gomez de la Serna a la largo de su vida: el de la calle Puebla, el Torreon de Velazquez, y el de la calle Villanueva en Madrid, y el de Buenos Aires. El objetivo es inspeccionar la realidad material de estas salas de trabajo – pequenos museos de la memoria – a la luz de la documentacion fotografica que nos ha quedado y los comentarios hechos por Gomez de la Serna sobre el diseno moderno en 'El hijo de los muebles nuevos' (1928) y en Ensayo sobre lo cursi (1934). La intencionalidad ultima, sin embargo, es aclarar la posicion estetica e ideologica de Ramon en relacion a la Espana de su tiempo y al binomio tradicion y modernidad.This essay studies the four spaces where Gomez de la Serna worked and wrote in his lifetime; the one on Puebla Street, the 'Torreon Velazquez' and the one on Villanueva Street in Madrid, and the last one in Buenos Aires. The material objects in these small museums of popular culture are analysed through available pho...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".