MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085674022 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.125508

Surface Modification without Desorption: Recycling of Cl on<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>Si</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>−</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>

2002· article· lv· W2085674022 on OpenAlexaff
Koji S. Nakayama, Elton Graugnard, J. H. Weaver

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesorptionDimerAtom (system on chip)Materials scienceDiffusionVacancy defectAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryPhysicsCrystallographyChemistryThermodynamicsComputer scienceAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate chlorine-induced modification of Si(100)-(2 x 1) under conditions where Cl is recycled rather than desorbed as SiCl2. A dimer with 2 Cl atoms, 2SiCl, converts to SiCl2+Si, allowing the bare Si atom to escape onto the terrace. At temperatures below the desorption threshold, the SiCl2 unit decays through Cl diffusion, allowing the second Si atom to escape. The result is a dimer vacancy, terrace regrowth structures, and Cl that is able to participate in another pitting event. Access to this unexpected roughening pathway is controlled by the Cl concentration and temperature. This previously overlooked process represents an important component of Si(100) surface processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207