Doxorubicin-induced late cardiotoxicity: delayed impairment of Ca<sup>2+</sup>-handling mechanisms in the sarcoplasmic reticulum in the rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Doxorubicin treatment causes delayed development of cardiotoxicity. Whether the doxorubicin-induced impairment of cardiac functions reverses or progresses with time after the cessation of the treatment was examined. The rats were injected with doxorubicin (2.5 mg/kg, i.v., once a week for 3 weeks) and sacrificed at 1 (1W), 13 (13W), or 18 (18W) weeks after the final doxorubicin administration. The time to peak of twitch contraction observed at 2-Hz stimulation was not altered in left atrial or ventricular muscle preparations isolated from 1W rats, but it was prolonged in those from 13W and 18W rats. The reduction of the magnitude of postrest contraction and the alteration of force-frequency relationships in left atrial muscle preparations in 1W rats were not significant, but were intensified in the 13W and 18W groups. Alterations in the postrest contraction and the force-frequency relationships in ventricular muscle preparations isolated from doxorubicin-treated rat hearts were weaker, but the pattern of alteration was similar to that observed in left atrial muscle preparations. Caffeine-induced contraction observed in skinned fibers that were isolated from the 1W rats was not altered, but it was reduced in the 18W rats. The Ca2+ sensitivity of contractile proteins was not altered in doxorubicin-treated rat hearts in any of the groups. The K(d) values estimated from a [3H]ryanodine binding study were not altered, but the B(max) values were significantly lower in the 13W and 18W groups than those observed in control rats. These results suggest that the dysfunction of the sarcoplasmic reticulum progresses after the completion of doxorubicin treatment and contributes to the doxorubicin-induced late cardiotoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".