MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085715889 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v4n2p198

Examining Semantic Priming in a Delayed Naming Task

2012· article· en· W2085715889 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karen Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPriming (agriculture)PsychologyTask (project management)Context (archaeology)Word (group theory)Cognitive psychologyLexical decision taskSemantic memoryLinguisticsCognitionNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semantic priming refers to the finding that a word response is facilitated if it is preceded by a related wordcompared to when it is preceded by an unrelated word. Research has shown that semantic priming effects stilloccur under task conditions which would permit ample time for the completion of word recognition processesprior to response production. This study sought to examine the impact of a related prime-target context on wordproduction. Participants completed an immediate word naming task and a delayed word naming task. There wasa semantic priming effect for the immediate naming task. For the delayed naming task semantic priming wasonly evident at the 500 ms cue delay. This suggests a limited time frame in which a semantic context is able tofacilitate word production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychological StudiesSame topicReading and Literacy DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207