MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085746084 · doi:10.1021/ef201925c

Simulation Study of the Toe-to-Heel Air Injection Three-Dimensional Combustion Cell Experiment and Effects in the Mobile Oil Zone

2012· article· en· W2085746084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Greaves, Lei Dong, Sean P. Rigby

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsOil sandsSecondary air injectionAsphaltCombustionPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceFluid catalytic crackingProcess (computing)CrackingWaste managementGeologyMaterials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional in situ combustion (ISC) has largely failed to establish itself as a major heavy oil recovery process. However, the recent successful field piloting of the toe-to-heel air injection (THAI) process by Petrobank, in the Athabasca oil sands, Conklin, Alberta, Canada, seems set to develop a major new era of ISC technology. A new numerical model of the THAI–ISC process has been developed, using three-dimensional combustion cell data in conjunction with Phillips thermal cracking kinetics. Excellent agreement was obtained between the simulation predictions and a number of measured dynamic parameters, including the oil production rate. The fine-scale predictions have enabled new insights into the operation of the process, especially concerning the important mobile oil zone (MOZ) from which partially upgraded oil is produced. The properties of the MOZ not only affect oil production but also determine to what extent further in situ upgrading of the bitumen is possible using the catalytic THAI–CAPRI process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207