Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canopy-forming seaweeds are often considered as important foundation species or ecosystem engineers. In wave-sheltered rocky intertidal habitats in Atlantic Canada, macroalgal canopies are composed primarily of Ascophyllum nodosum and secondarily of Fucus spp. Field experiments revealed that the effects of these canopies on benthic communities (considering primary producers and consumers) depend on the level of environmental stress that is determined by tides. Positive canopy effects occur at high and middle elevations, where canopies ameliorate the otherwise harsh conditions during low tides, but no significant effects occur at low elevations, where conditions remain mild during low tides regardless of canopy presence. Canopies of fucoid algae covering the intertidal zone during a low tide on a wave-sheltered rocky shore in Nova Scotia, Canada. Photograph by R. A. Scrosati. This photograph illustrates the data paper “Experimental and mensurative data on the abundance of primary producers and consumers from intertidal habitats in Canada” by Cortney A. Watt and Ricardo A. Scrosati, which appeared in Ecology 95(5):1429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/14-0071.1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".