Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alors que sous l’empire du Code civil du Bas-Canada, le droit international privé faisait figure de parent pauvre, le législateur québécois a choisi de le codifier en lui consacrant un livre entier lors de la réforme du Code civil, entré en vigueur le 1er janvier 2004. Plusieurs de ces nouveaux articles sont inspirés de textes d’origine européenne. En se concentrant sur la liberté contractuelle qui permet aux parties de désigner le droit applicable à leur relation, élément essentiel dans les relations commerciales internationales, l’auteur a mis en parallèle les nouvelles règles et leurs sources. Au terme de cet exercice, force est de constater que les dispositions étudiées du Code civil du Québec véhiculent généralement les mêmes principes et comportent souvent des prescriptions comparables à leurs modèles. Cependant, on ne peut parler de copie conforme puisqu’il est possible de relever plusieurs points de divergence voire d’opposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".