MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The occurrence of mass transport processes during the leaching of amygdalin from bitter apricot kernels: detoxification and flavour improvement

2005· article· en· W2085835683 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelmadjid Silem, Hans‐Otto Günter, Jörn Einfeldt, A. Boualia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCassava research and cyanide
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalCollege Ahuntsic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmygdalinMass transferDetoxification (alternative medicine)ChemistryDiffusionExtractorMass transfer coefficientFlavourPartition coefficientBiological systemThermodynamicsChromatographyProcess engineeringFood sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Because of their appreciable protein content apricot kernels could be used as a good source of food. However, their wide use for human or animal nutrition is dependent on their adequate detoxification. This is because apricot kernels have a strong bitter flavour that is caused by the presence of amygdalin, a toxic cyanogenic glycoside. The aim of the present work was to investigate an unusual method of detoxifying apricot kernels by soaking them in water. The method was energetically relatively inexpensive as uncrushed kernels and cold water were used. Furthermore, the use of intact kernels minimized the loss of nutritious soluble matter during the detoxification. On the basis of a simple but adequate mechanistic model, a mathematical description of the extractive detoxification of apricot kernels is proposed. The two‐resistance mass transfer system is based on external film mass transfer and an effective solid diffusion. A linear equilibrium curve arises from the assumption that the concentration profile inside the solid phase can be well approximated with a second order polynomial calculation, this then leads to an analytical formulation of the mathematical model. The liquid‐phase mass transfer coefficient and the internal diffusion coefficient in the kernels can be then determined. Finally, the model is used to describe extractor behaviour and predict process performance under real operation conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food Science & TechnologySame topicCassava research and cyanideFrench-language works237,207