MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085852373 · doi:10.1021/cm011603s

Control of Conjugation Length and Enhancement of Fluorescence Efficiency of Poly(<i>p</i>-phenylenevinylene)s via Post-halogenation

2002· article· en· W2085852373 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuning Li, George Vamvounis, Steven Holdcroft

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersDirection de l’hospitalisation et de l’offre de SoinsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHalogenationFluorescenceSolubilityChemistryPhotochemistryPolymerSuccinimidePhenylenePolymer chemistryHalogenSolvatochromismMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryAlkylMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-functionalization of poly( p -2,5-dihexyloxy−phenyelenevinylene) ( DHO − PPV ) was studied using N -bromosuccinimide (NBS) and N -chlorosuccinimide (NCS) in CHCl 3 and CHCl 3 /AcOH to control the color of fluorescence emission and to enhance emission efficiency. It was found that in addition to electrophilic substitution on phenylene rings, halogen and succinimide (in CHCl 3 ) and acetate groups (in CHCl 3 /AcOH) add across the main chain vinylene groups. With low NXS/PPV reaction ratios (0.1−0.35), where X = Br or Cl, the resulting polymers show poor solubility, a red shift of the absorption maximum, and a decrease in the solid-state fluorescence efficiency (Φ fl ), which are explained on the basis of enhanced interchain interactions. For NXS/PPV reaction ratios between 0.5 and 0.75, the solubility of polymers was significantly improved and Φ fl was enhanced by up to 150% due to exciton confinement and a reduction in chain aggregation. For NXS/PPV reaction ratios >0.75, Φ fl decreased dramatically because of an increasing loss of π-conjugation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207