MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085864221 · doi:10.1134/s2075111713030090

Distribution of native and introduced semiaquatic mammals in Sikhote-Alin

2013· article· en· W2085864221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Yu. Oleinikov

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Biological Invasions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLutraAmerican minkMinkBeaverOtterBiologyEcologyCastor canadensisHabitatInterspecific competitionZoologyIntroduced species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data on current habitat ranges of five species of semiaquatic mammals are given in the article. The data were collected in various parts of Sikhote-Alin in 2002–2012. Four of the species, American mink ( Neovison vison Schreb.), muskrat ( Ondatra zibethicus L.), Eurasian beaver ( Castor fiber L.), and Canadian beaver ( C. canadensis Kuhl), are introduced. A native species is the otter ( Lutra lutra L.). The stages of introduction and peculiarities of distribution of the semiaquatic species populations are described. The spatial distribution of the animals on the Obor and Durmin rivers selected as the model ones by us previously is analyzed (Oleinikov, 2007). The middle reaches of these rivers demonstrate the greatest variety of semiaquatic species, and their density is maximal in the lower reaches, which is mainly due to the muskrat. The spatial dissociation as a mechanism of alleviation of interspecific relationships is revealed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Biological InvasionsSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207