MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085871034 · doi:10.1364/ao.42.005749

Ion-beam etching for the precise manufacture of optical coatings: erratum

2003· erratum· en· W2085871034 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Poitras, J. A. Dobrowolski, Tom Cassidy, S. Moisa

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2003
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationEtching (microfabrication)Materials scienceBeam (structure)IonOptoelectronicsOpticsNanotechnologyComputer sciencePhysicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Get PDF Email Share Share with Facebook Tweet This Post on reddit Share with LinkedIn Add to CiteULike Add to Mendeley Add to BibSonomy Get Citation Copy Citation Text Daniel Poitras, J. A. Dobrowolski, Tom Cassidy, and Simona Moisa, "Ion-beam etching for the precise manufacture of optical coatings: erratum," Appl. Opt. 42, 5749-5749 (2003) Export Citation BibTex Endnote (RIS) HTML Plain Text Citation alert Save article

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207