MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085873073 · doi:10.2217/1745509x.1.2.263

Osteoporosis in Men: The Quieter Half of a Silent Disease

2005· article· en· W2085873073 on OpenAlexaff
Wojciech P. Olszynski, K. Shawn Davison

Bibliographic record

VenueAging Health · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalOsteoporosis Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisMedicineDiseaseFragility fracturePopulationIntensive care medicineInternal medicineBone mineralEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoporosis has most commonly been regarded as a ‘woman’s disease’. However, recent evidence has demonstrated that the prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in men is far higher than previously believed. While there is a vast body of knowledge regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in women, there is a relative lack of information regarding these topics in men. However, data that can guide the effective treatment of men with osteoporosis and, perhaps more importantly, how to prevent the loss of bone to levels that would dramatically increase fracture risk, is starting to accumulate. Men may represent a dramatically underserved portion of the population with regard to the avoidance of debilitating, and often fatal, fragility fractures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAging HealthSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207