Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of esterase-producing<i>Ureibacillus thermosphaericus</i>isolated from an aerobic digestor of swine waste
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eight closely related thermophilic strains were isolated from an aerobic and thermophilic treatment of swine wastes. The pleomorphic cells (short and long rods; cocci) showed peritrichous flagella, terminally swollen sporangium, and liberated spores exhibiting hairy appendages. The Gram reaction was negative for both young (4 h) and old (48 h) cultures. Several features, such as colonial morphology, growth between 35 degrees C and 65 degrees C, presence of catalase, presence of spores, and strictly aerobic metabolism (except for one strain), are similar to those found for the genus Bacillus. The inability of the strains to use sugars, except esculin, as source of carbon and energy and the whole cell fatty acid composition are similar to those found in Bacillus thermosphaericus DSM 10633. Sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene revealed 99.8%-99.9% identity for seven of the thermophilic strains with this species. A new genus, Ureibacillus, was recently proposed for type strain B. thermosphaericus DSM 10633 The last strain exhibits 97.8% and 97.3% identity with Ureibacillus terrenus DSM12654 and Bacillus sp. TP-84, respectively. Esterase activities were detected for all strains, and assays on p-nitrophenyl butyrate and p-nitrophenyl caprylate revealed that strains were more active on the shorter substrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".