MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085917124 · doi:10.1097/crd.0b013e3182532286

Coronary Artery Disease in South Asians

2012· review· en· W2085917124 on OpenAlexaff
Seshasayee Narasimhan, Katrina McKay, Kevin R. Bainey

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology in Review · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEthnic groupDiseaseCoronary artery diseaseIntervention (counseling)Promotion (chess)South asiaInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well established that South Asians living in the western world have a higher burden of cardiovascular disease than other ethnicities. Additionally, South Asians develop cardiovascular disease at a younger age, have a more aggressive form of coronary artery disease, and a higher overall mortality. This predilection seems to be multifactorial and includes a combination of traditional and emerging risk factors with an absence of ethnic-specific prevention and control measures. Future direction points toward ongoing research with the aim of discovering technology for earlier detection. Additionally, coronary artery disease in South Asians could be addressed by increasing awareness, modifying health beliefs through health-promotion strategies, and instituting ethnic-specific control measures including appropriate and early pharmacological intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology in ReviewSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207